🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include events where Black people are compensated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to remove Black history and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.